 |
 |
 |
 |
#327003 - 01/14/10 02:10 PM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Madison_2112]
|
Regular
Registered: 05/27/03
Loc: on the prowl
|
Obviously, not many of us would like to be outed to millions of people like that. True but if you put yourself up as a Pollie your past follows you and you cannot run. She knew it would come out. And, depending on how you look at it, the joke could actually be on the guy who stormed off of the set, upset that she used to be a man. He was playing the role of the guy who finds out that a woman he thought was pretty (and maybe more)... "used to be a man." In a way, and depending on how someone interprets it, it could show that it's silly to judge someone like this. The skit exemplifies the fact that you can't always tell who is transgender and who is not. I think that's actually important, since a lot of people are convinced that they can always tell. I've been standing around guys who were talking about a girl who was trans around me and they were saying that they could tell she was trans... that they can ALWAYS tell. Yet, they didn't have a clue that I'm also trans. They were saying some degrading things about her and basically saying that she was gross. In a way, I sort of wanted to tell them that I'm trans, too, just to prove a point. But, I didn't because I didn't want them to then see me the same way. I find on the rare occasions I have announced myself the reaction is always "oh yeah I knew all along". . . . then I know they are full of **it!
_________________________
"Don't ya think that I don't know what they say and what they think, but I don't care"
(Down The Road! Bee Gees 1974 Mr Natural)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#327020 - 01/15/10 09:35 AM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Bye]
|
Pledge
Registered: 10/29/09
|
Speaking as a professional writer, who's written a lot of comedy material (you wouldn't guess it, I know, from what I post on here, but I have!), I have mixed feelings about this. Obviously the notion that a woman who 'used to be a dude' is so shocking that it makes a man want to leave the stage and (presumably) vomit is, to put it mildly, negative. And yes, it reinforces prejudices ..
Or does it?
Look at it another way and the joke is on the guy who can't handle the fact that Amanda is transgender. Now who's problem is that: hers ... or his?
Any time you make a joke about any kind of minority, you invariably tread on all kinds of sensitivities: even if you come from that minority. Chris Rock's routines about the difference between black people and niggers would be complete unsayable from a white comedian ... but they were pretty shocking to many black people when he came out with them, too. Does that mean he should have kept his mouth shut?
When Sacha Baron-Cohen made Bruno, he was mocking the people who couldn't handle someone as 'out' as this crazy Austrian fashion victim. But lots of gay men felt that he was using and abusing negative stereotypes about gays. Who was right or wrong here?
Personally, I think that the ability to make and take a joke is part of the process of acceptance. My closest friend is Jewish. He knows I define myself as TS, even tho I haven't transitioned. I can make gags about his religion. He can call me a chick (and plenty more besides). Neither of us takes any offence because we take our friendship for granted and know that either of us could totally rely on the other in any time of need. When I do transition, he will support me all the way, and that's what counts.
Now, David Letterman is not Amanda's BFF so far as I know. But if you look at the sketch, his attitude is not mocking towards her. If anything, the look he gives the guy who runs off stage is much more disdainful.
In the end, the fact that this subject can be joked about on network TV and the joke is on someone who pretends to be shocked seems to me, on balance, to be positive. My guess is that if Amanda went on Letterman next week she'd get a huge round of applause. People would like the fact that she could handle the joke and if she came across well, which I'm sure she would, they would very quickly warm to her and admire her.
You may say, 'Why should she have to handle the joke?' Well, because life is better if we can see the funny side of things and learn that there is a difference between self-respect and pomposity: we don't have to take ourselves TOO seriously. If I were advising Amanda right now, I'd say she should make a joke back, then go on Letterman and wow everyone.
Th net result would be incredibly positive for her ... and all other transgender people ... And - whether we like it or not - it would garner far more acceptance and respect than whining about discrimination.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#327021 - 01/15/10 10:51 AM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Diana P]
|
Misanthropic Cow
Registered: 03/31/03
Loc: Pasture
|
I could compare the situation in three countries where I've lived.
In Peru, people are crass, and ethnic jokes and slurs are all over the place. And, of course, like any place in the planet, we do have an openly racist minority and a subtle racist majority. But the ease with which people tells jokes about any group (and goddess knows we got them all) has made it possible to have friends of many backgrounds. And inter-racial marriages in the middle class are the norm.
In the USA, the situation is much more guarded. People check themselves, but still most are able to push the limits of the politicall correct, and ethnic-based humour is not uncommon. You don't need to know someone (from a different background) for years and years to open up, but the pressure not to step out of boundary is also strong. Mixed groups of friends are much less common than in Peru, but still fairly common.
In Canada, we're just too polite to ever even suggest humour based on differences. The person by your side could be an orange midget dressed as a chicken, and you're not supposed to notice. That's the right way of being, politeness above all. Hence, social interaction is incredibly strained. Any little move can be a terrible faux pas, something that will smear your social value for a long time. As a consequence, we're a very divided society, and it's very rare to see groups of people that are mixed in composition.
Basically, the degree to which sense of humour is allowed seems to correlate with actual integration.
It's a regional thing, too. Many areas deep in Peru are completely different; people in Houston seemed to me a bit more guarded about these issues than those in New Jersey; and in Canada, Toronto is more similar to the USA and the "excessive political correctness" increases as you move West.
Victoria, in particular, is pretty humourless about such things. People ignore all differences and all strangeness as a basis for co-existence, but in order to do so, all inter-group relationships are kept exceedingly superficial. The result is a very clean, very ordered mass isolation (which suits some people fine).
Perhaps peacefulness and openness are inversely proportional, and the price to pay to live in a society with no crime and no fights is to always be on your toes about never bothering anyone. Perhaps the price to pay for having no enemies is having no true friends, either.
_________________________
This a spiritual thing and I am the laughing Buddha sitting on top of the world. Donnalee. "Populace above, populace below! What are 'poor' and 'rich' at present! That distinction did I unlearn,—then did I flee away further and ever further, until I came to those kine." -- Thus Spake Zarathustra / Friedrich Nietzsche. http://my.funtrivia.com/tournament/Callies-quiz-75578.html
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#327028 - 01/15/10 01:49 PM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Marcella]
|
Pledge
Registered: 10/29/09
|
In Canada, we're just too polite to ever even suggest humour based on differences. The person by your side could be an orange midget dressed as a chicken, and you're not supposed to notice. That's the right way of being, politeness above all. Hence, social interaction is incredibly strained. Any little move can be a terrible faux pas, something that will smear your social value for a long time. As a consequence, we're a very divided society, and it's very rare to see groups of people that are mixed in composition.
Basically, the degree to which sense of humour is allowed seems to correlate with actual integration.
Perhaps peacefulness and openness are inversely proportional, and the price to pay to live in a society with no crime and no fights is to always be on your toes about never bothering anyone. Perhaps the price to pay for having no enemies is having no true friends, either.
Excellent points! Totally agree ...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#327034 - 01/15/10 02:55 PM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Diana P]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 04/01/08
Loc: NZ
|
Speaking as a professional writer, who's written a lot of comedy material (you wouldn't guess it, I know, from what I post on here, but I have!), I have mixed feelings about this. Obviously the notion that a woman who 'used to be a dude' is so shocking that it makes a man want to leave the stage and (presumably) vomit is, to put it mildly, negative. And yes, it reinforces prejudices ..
Or does it?
Look at it another way and the joke is on the guy who can't handle the fact that Amanda is transgender. Now who's problem is that: hers ... or his?
Any time you make a joke about any kind of minority, you invariably tread on all kinds of sensitivities: even if you come from that minority. Chris Rock's routines about the difference between black people and niggers would be complete unsayable from a white comedian ... but they were pretty shocking to many black people when he came out with them, too. Does that mean he should have kept his mouth shut?
When Sacha Baron-Cohen made Bruno, he was mocking the people who couldn't handle someone as 'out' as this crazy Austrian fashion victim. But lots of gay men felt that he was using and abusing negative stereotypes about gays. Who was right or wrong here?
Personally, I think that the ability to make and take a joke is part of the process of acceptance. My closest friend is Jewish. He knows I define myself as TS, even tho I haven't transitioned. I can make gags about his religion. He can call me a chick (and plenty more besides). Neither of us takes any offence because we take our friendship for granted and know that either of us could totally rely on the other in any time of need. When I do transition, he will support me all the way, and that's what counts.
Now, David Letterman is not Amanda's BFF so far as I know. But if you look at the sketch, his attitude is not mocking towards her. If anything, the look he gives the guy who runs off stage is much more disdainful.
In the end, the fact that this subject can be joked about on network TV and the joke is on someone who pretends to be shocked seems to me, on balance, to be positive. My guess is that if Amanda went on Letterman next week she'd get a huge round of applause. People would like the fact that she could handle the joke and if she came across well, which I'm sure she would, they would very quickly warm to her and admire her.
You may say, 'Why should she have to handle the joke?' Well, because life is better if we can see the funny side of things and learn that there is a difference between self-respect and pomposity: we don't have to take ourselves TOO seriously. If I were advising Amanda right now, I'd say she should make a joke back, then go on Letterman and wow everyone.
Th net result would be incredibly positive for her ... and all other transgender people ... And - whether we like it or not - it would garner far more acceptance and respect than whining about discrimination. After you've transitioned and have been openly (and often) mocked in public for being a 'tranny', come back and tell us how your opinions have changed. You lack the necessary experience to understand the implications and ramifications of such a skit.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#327038 - 01/15/10 03:34 PM
Re: Tell CBS D.Letterman was wrong to ridicule TS
[Re: Bye]
|
Supreme Oracle
Registered: 05/11/06
|
Speaking as a professional writer, who's written a lot of comedy material (you wouldn't guess it, I know, from what I post on here, but I have!), I have mixed feelings about this. Obviously the notion that a woman who 'used to be a dude' is so shocking that it makes a man want to leave the stage and (presumably) vomit is, to put it mildly, negative. And yes, it reinforces prejudices ..
Or does it?
Look at it another way and the joke is on the guy who can't handle the fact that Amanda is transgender. Now who's problem is that: hers ... or his?
Any time you make a joke about any kind of minority, you invariably tread on all kinds of sensitivities: even if you come from that minority. Chris Rock's routines about the difference between black people and niggers would be complete unsayable from a white comedian ... but they were pretty shocking to many black people when he came out with them, too. Does that mean he should have kept his mouth shut?
When Sacha Baron-Cohen made Bruno, he was mocking the people who couldn't handle someone as 'out' as this crazy Austrian fashion victim. But lots of gay men felt that he was using and abusing negative stereotypes about gays. Who was right or wrong here?
Personally, I think that the ability to make and take a joke is part of the process of acceptance. My closest friend is Jewish. He knows I define myself as TS, even tho I haven't transitioned. I can make gags about his religion. He can call me a chick (and plenty more besides). Neither of us takes any offence because we take our friendship for granted and know that either of us could totally rely on the other in any time of need. When I do transition, he will support me all the way, and that's what counts.
Now, David Letterman is not Amanda's BFF so far as I know. But if you look at the sketch, his attitude is not mocking towards her. If anything, the look he gives the guy who runs off stage is much more disdainful.
In the end, the fact that this subject can be joked about on network TV and the joke is on someone who pretends to be shocked seems to me, on balance, to be positive. My guess is that if Amanda went on Letterman next week she'd get a huge round of applause. People would like the fact that she could handle the joke and if she came across well, which I'm sure she would, they would very quickly warm to her and admire her.
You may say, 'Why should she have to handle the joke?' Well, because life is better if we can see the funny side of things and learn that there is a difference between self-respect and pomposity: we don't have to take ourselves TOO seriously. If I were advising Amanda right now, I'd say she should make a joke back, then go on Letterman and wow everyone.
Th net result would be incredibly positive for her ... and all other transgender people ... And - whether we like it or not - it would garner far more acceptance and respect than whining about discrimination. After you've transitioned and have been openly (and often) mocked in public for being a 'tranny', come back and tell us how your opinions have changed. You lack the necessary experience to understand the implications and ramifications of such a skit. So you want to play the credentials game eh VEX? I think mine are equal to or better than yours since I am post and have faced open public mocking head on. Bottom line is I agree with Diana and Marcella. Your position is a fail IMHO and were you wise you might search for a way to handle such incidents gracefully instead of belligerently. Being bellicose seldom carries the day. 
_________________________
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|