 |
 |
 |
 |
#331916 - 03/13/10 04:16 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: AnnieMac]
|
Registered: 07/12/03
Loc: Atlanta, GA
|
Every other CNN documentary has been made with a 'personality', Amanpour, Cooper, someone, that leads the viewer through the story. This documentary doesn't have anyone doing that.
It's almost 2 years of a crew following Susan around plus interviews with others that were involved, like her electrologist, the mayor of Largo, FL. There is also part of an interview with Donna Rose about Susan that was filmed at last years Southern Comfort Conference.
I hope many people here watch it and comment on it. I'm looking forward to reading what people think of it, good, bad or indifferent.
Brenda
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331926 - 03/13/10 04:50 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: BrendaK]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
I don't think this is about being unique but an opportunity to show the uneducated public an all to common story. Claims of "educating" the "public" seems specious after nearly forty years of media attention from Christine Jorgenson, through Renee Richards, Canary Conn, and countless others throughout the decades, often portrayed in full-length television biopics, and such. The "public" has been bombarded with "information" about trans-people for decade upon decade. For the most part though, the average person has developed little more than an ability to make trans-people the punch line of jokes. It also seems like the average person has just become inured, to the subject, and seem to often just refer to even the most beautiful post-vaginoplasty women merely as "men", period. We say transsexual, they just say "men", all too often, no matter how many of these "stories" they see on television.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331930 - 03/13/10 04:57 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: mixie]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
What might make an interesting documentary, would be an extended portrayal of someone analogous to Lynn Conway, who "transitioned" young, lived a long life in "stealth" but because she is "out" now for whatever reason , might show a wider audience what an assimilated and successful life like hers looks like from a more distant perspective, in retrospect.
Even a similar sort of documentary might be interesting, about someone in their thirties today, who got everything done ten or more years ago, who has been living an assimilated and together live since then, possibly in "stealth"(until the documentary of course), where the video might show a wider audience what someone's life is like long after the HRT has done its thing, the surgeries have long since been done, and the initial social upheaval has long been over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331932 - 03/13/10 05:03 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: BrendaK]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
You're right she did. That's brought out in the documentary. Does Stanton apologize in the documentary for making those hugely public statements against ENDA? Does the documentary explain that Stanton's statements against ENDA created a huge uproar among the trans-population? Does Stanton explain why she didn't approach "transition" in a more privacy protecting way, instead of taking the big social demand action that caused the Largo city government to fire her? Imagine if Stanton had been the sort of person who saves their money for transition, then quietly resigns their job, then spends their savings to get their surgery, and quietly looks for a new job with the new paper and physical identity afterward. IMO, that approach shows a lot more sensitivity to one's social milieu. Regardless of the law, on the job "transition" in place, implies narcissistic entitlement, IMO, about something that is extremely socially complex and regardless of "rights", places a lot of emotional stress on everybody else involved, even if they are supportive.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331939 - 03/13/10 05:58 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: hollyb]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
As I recall Stanton chose not to sue the city that dismissed him (him at at time, her later). As such I regard Stanton as part of the problem rather than part of the solution. The problem being that the poorest transsexual people do not have robust employment rights and can't afford to enforce what they do have.
As such the best thing Stanton could do for the community would be to go away and be forgotten. The only thing the lawsuit would have been good for would have been to force the city government to spend money (its own form of punishment), which can be a good thing. However, at the time, it seems likely that such a lawsuit would have failed, even though some have succeeded since then in other more favorable jurisdictions, and historically, almost all have failed throughout the United States. Florida is notoriously bad with regard to state level trans-rights as well, and such a lawsuit might have only created a negative precedent, with the possibility of damaging future lawsuits, brought during some future time when the legal and political climate might be more receptive. Stanton is apparently a city manager again, in another nearby suburb called Lake Worth, FL, anyway. http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/lake-worth-expected-to-settle-water-dispute-with-278850.html
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331951 - 03/14/10 07:58 AM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: mixie]
|
Registered: 07/12/03
Loc: Atlanta, GA
|
Does Stanton apologize in the documentary for making those hugely public statements against ENDA?
No, she doesn't. Now that she has some distance, in time, I wonder if she's grown up enough to do that? Does the documentary explain that Stanton's statements against ENDA created a huge uproar among the trans-population?
Yes, it does. Does Stanton explain why she didn't approach "transition" in a more privacy protecting way, instead of taking the big social demand action that caused the Largo city government to fire her?
Yes, she does. Imagine if Stanton had been the sort of person who saves their money for transition, then quietly resigns their job, then spends their savings to get their surgery, and quietly looks for a new job with the new paper and physical identity afterward. IMO, that approach shows a lot more sensitivity to one's social milieu. Regardless of the law, on the job "transition" in place, implies narcissistic entitlement, IMO, about something that is extremely socially complex and regardless of "rights", places a lot of emotional stress on everybody else involved, even if they are supportive.
We're supposed to save up money and tuck our proverbial tail between our legs, leave everything and everyone, hide (sometimes called 'stealth') and fear for the rest of our lives that someone will discover our 'dirty secret'? If someone wants, hide. If someone wants, don't let the bigots know that you exist. If someone wants, live in fear. Not for me!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331956 - 03/14/10 11:01 AM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: kaitlyn]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
I'm not sure about eveything in life, but some of you who possess this "holier than thou" attitude about people like Susan Stanton really need to pull your head out of the sand.
When the media, for whatever reason, deems a story like hers to be worthy of attention it brings us as a group into the lives of those who may never have considered us. Education of the public is paramount to build the kind of understanding that society needs to have if we as a group are to have any success in being assimilated into society.
Oh, wait, if that happened, what would you have to bitch about? There are some trans-people's stories that I think would be worthy and interesting for television coverage, but Susan Stanton is not one of them. in an earlier post, I described at least one person, Lynn Conway, who I think would make a great documentary subject, because the story of her long life is quite exemplary, and includes extraordinary scientific accomplish, as well as an enviable personal life. There are plenty of us who use our posts to be complimentary and positive most often, and when it is appropriate. However Susan Stanton has made a large group of people permanently angry at her, and that is going to show within mention of her anywhere among the knowing trans-population for a very long time. As I also wrote in an earlier post, the "education" reasoning for presenting such documentaries just has not panned out in the light history, since the general American populace has been watching these sorts of documentaries for at least four decades, without any discernible positive impact on the average person's level of empathy or understanding.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331967 - 03/14/10 02:49 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: kaitlyn]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
when it comes to media exposure, beggars can't be choosers. I for one am not begging. That is one documentary that could have gladly been left in the editing room without ever seeing the airwaves. There are other forms of media and other people much better suited to providing a public view of trans-people. As I noted above, a good candidate would be someone like Lynn Conway, who is worth looking up for anyone who isn't familiar with her. Another person worthy of a documentary solely about her would be Andrea James, who nearly singlehandedly put FFS into the mainstream of surgical treatment for trans-women, and has done countless other remarkable things over the past fifteen years or so, like creating a DVD set to help teach trans-women how to speak properly, which is no easy task, but one that Andrea James has mastered in exemplary fashion as well. To me, she is someone whose tangible accomplishments demonstrate a concern not only for herself, but for the well-being of the entire trans-population, making her a truly interesting subject for a documentary. In addition, in this digital era, Andrea James has also demonstrated that nobody needs to "beg" for media exposure, as Andrea has shown by creating a lot of her own media, such has her recent short film "transproofed".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331969 - 03/14/10 03:06 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: mixie]
|
Misanthropic Cow
Registered: 03/31/03
Loc: Pasture
|
If you're not in the eyes of the media, your cultural significance is irrelevant. You don't exist.
Those who are out there, they do. And I bet they pay a price for that.
I'm ok as a private person. Could be conviction or cowardice, who cares. At this point all I want to be is a good citizen and a good influence on the people around me.
Which is impossible to know, of course. At best, I can think I make them a bit happier when I'm around. I may be wrong, of course.
Otherwise, since I lack the courage or the narcissism to make myself relevant as a "voice of the TS" or whatever, my public opinions are about as important as those of a gnat.
Which suits me fine. I only care about the opinions of those who know me as a person, in person.
_________________________
This a spiritual thing and I am the laughing Buddha sitting on top of the world. Donnalee. "Populace above, populace below! What are 'poor' and 'rich' at present! That distinction did I unlearn,—then did I flee away further and ever further, until I came to those kine." -- Thus Spake Zarathustra / Friedrich Nietzsche. http://my.funtrivia.com/tournament/Callies-quiz-75578.html
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#331993 - 03/14/10 11:28 PM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: Deena]
|
Regular
Registered: 01/07/09
|
Guess what, in a few short years Susan will be just as famous and respected while you (generic you) and I languish in obscurity. Strange how that works. In all likelihood, Susan Stanton will languish in the same obscurity that surrounds ninety-nine percent of all people who are publicly outed and trounced through the media for a while. The list of trans-women who have had fifteen minutes of "fame" followed by decades of relative obscurity is long and often not well traveled. Even a virtual stroll through amazon.com reveals countless trans-biographies that are probably read mostly by other trans-women, but whose authors otherwise exist in relative obscurity, despite having even published the stories of portions of their lives. Without a thread like this one, how often do even names like: Wendy Carlos Caroline Cossey and hundreds more come to mind? Some actually seem to seek out anonymity and obscurity after a period of major exposure, like Canary Conn from the 1970s, who has long since disappeared, apparently changed her name before digital court records began to make it ridiculously simple to uncover name changes, hasn't been heard from by the general trans-population in eons, and whose name pops up mostly from time to time, for the very reason that she has been personally invisible for quite a long time. As others have written in this thread, the price most such people have paid for public exposure has often been an expensive one too. For example, a visit to the web site of Wendy Carlos includes a visit to a page wherein Carlos expresses enormous anger about peoples' inability to let go of her medical past, and even veiled references to continued death threats over the course of thirty or so years. Another example of how quickly exposure fades would be this site's own founder, Calpernia Addams, who was the subject of high public scrutiny a decade ago, including a cable movie, and an A&E documentary about she and her murdered boyfriend, but if you check her imdb.com listing today, she hasn't been involved in many cinema projects other than personal projects created together by she and Andrea James. Most of all, despite all that transpired a decade ago, it seems doubtful that the average person understands the significance of Addams and her murdered boyfriend with regard to the military DADT policy, and why it also should not apply. By comparison, anonymity and privacy may be some of the best protection someone can hope for in contrast to the constant onslaught of negativity that those in the public sometimes cope with. I for one, value the benefits and limitations of private life immensely!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#332001 - 03/15/10 11:09 AM
Re: Susan Stanton documentary on CNN
[Re: kaitlyn]
|
Supreme Oracle
Registered: 05/11/06
|
There is no single saviour for us. Nobody is perfect. Some can live in stealth, others have no choice. Nobody knows what Susan went through, and you never will. Because you are outed so publicly, and prematurely by the media, you either hide, or throw yourself out there, and do your best. I'm happy for those of you who can live your lives privately, the way it should be. None of you has the right to criticize without having been there. I know what it's like.I have people calling me a "media whore" because I have done interviews and written articles. These are all of your own opinions, about other human beings. Try to have a little respect, as you hide behind your computers. Well said IMHO. 
_________________________
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|